We use cookies and other tools to enhance your experience on our website and to analyze our web traffic.
For more information about these cookies and the data collected, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

SleepDent

SleepDent
Joined May 2017
SleepDent
Joined May 2017

Now, even though I do use the Tap for the majority of my patients, I am not a one trick pony. I recognize that individual humans do have enough variation that one size does not fit all. For instance, some people just can not stand the feeling of having their mouth held shut. It makes them claustrophobic. For others, the TAPs just feel too bulky, even though they are on the slim side. They may need something like an EMA. But, if I do use something else, I will tell the patient that they are sacrificing some efficacy for the other features and may not get as good a result. And if somebody has a favorite appliance and their sleep test with oral appliance in place showed good efficacy, I am happy to do a new one like it. But there is a serious issue here that needs to be addressed. Patients do not know that different appliance designs can and do have very different efficacy rates. Many manufacturers don't do the research to validate the effectiveness of their products, relying on an F.D.A. clearance, which is basically a sham. It is incumbent on every sleep dentist to do their due diligence to assure the efficacy of the appliances that they are presenting to the patients. I simply will not use any appliance not validated by good third party research, not matter how much merit I suspect that it may have. There is too much at stake for the patients. In all fairness the the patients, if a patient wants a design that you know has a lesser efficacy, they should be told that it is not the most effective out there and it should be compared to the best and let them decide if they want to take the chance on it. a.b.luisi,d.m.d.