This question is actually very difficult to answer. Thankfully, relatively few people experience a heart attack or stroke in any given time period. Therefore, to show that a treatment is effective at decreasing these serious events, it is necessary to study very large numbers of people for a long time. Second, in order to establish the effectiveness of a treatment, it is important to study two groups of patients—one group who receives the treatment (CPAP) and one group who receives a different treatment, a placebo (like a sugar pill), or no treatment. Carrying out a large, complex trial requires both significant expertise and experience, as well as resources.
Given these challenges, a highly experienced team of researchers and clinicians from across the globe designed the SAVE trial—The Sleep Apnea Cardiovascular Endpoints trial. The principal investigators were based in Australia and secured funding from the Australian government and Philips-Respironics Inc. They organized teams of cardiologists, sleep medicine physicians, and clinical trialists from 89 medical centers in Australia, South America, Europe, Asia, and the U.S. to work closely together, over a period of over 7 years. They enrolled a total of 2,717 patients, ages 45 to 75 years old, half who received CPAP and half who were untreated. Patients were studied for an average of almost 4 years each, during which time the investigators compared the rates of heart disease events (such as strokes and heart attacks) in treated and untreated groups. Of note, since the study was interested in seeing if rates of heart disease or stroke decreased with treatment, it recruited patients who already had a history of a prior coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease—a group known to have a high risk of subsequent heart attacks or strokes. They also recruited patients who had at least moderate sleep apnea (defined by at least 12 drops in oxygen levels per hour at night) and patients who showed they were able to tolerate wearing a CPAP mask. Patients who were given CPAP used it on average for 4.4 hours during the first month of treatment, but usage decreased over time, with average use of only 3.3 hours per night over the period of treatment.
What did the study find? After a mean of 3.7 years of follow-up, the rate of heart disease events did not significantly differ for those who received CPAP or those who were untreated. However, patients treated with CPAP experienced significant improvements in sleepiness, anxiety and depressive symptoms and quality of life. Moreover, a sub-analysis restricted to patients who wore CPAP at least 4 hours a night for the first two years of treatment showed that CPAP reduced risk of strokes by about 40%.
What might these findings mean to you? When hearing about a new research study, it is important to ask how the patients in the study compare to you. The SAVE trial enrolled patients with known heart disease or stroke, enrolled people with relatively few symptoms from cardiology centers, and from mostly centers outside of the U.S. (predominantly in Asia). Achieving high levels of CPAP adherence for 89 international centers is a challenging task for a study to undertake, and despite strong efforts by the study team, average CPAP adherence was less than 4 hours per night over each person’s 3 to 4 years of follow-up. Rather than conclude that “CPAP does not help” it would be more appropriate to conclude that inadequate use of CPAP in patients who already have developed heart disease is unlikely to influence the risk of a heart attack over a 4 year period. However, based on the known beneficial effects of CPAP on blood pressure, it is reasonable to expect that CPAP could reduce the risk of heart disease if it is used for the entire sleep period—including times like the early morning, when REM sleep may cause particularly severe apneas and cardiovascular stress. Although this question needs to be examined with additional research, the study's finding from a secondary analysis showing that stroke risk was reduced in patients using CPAP for at least 4 hours per night does provide support for this. The beneficial effects on sleepiness, mood and quality of life –despite relatively low average CPAP usage—also provide a strong incentive to use CPAP. Finally, it is very possible that CPAP may be most effective in patients who have not already developed heart disease (as did the subjects of this study). The surveys that MyApnea.Org members have completed tell us that a majority of patients report that they had sleep apnea for many years before being treated. Prolonged periods of time when sleep apnea is not treated may cause damage to the blood vessels and the heart that may be hard to reverse.
We also interpret the data as indicating the need to find ways help to patients get their sleep apnea diagnosed and treated earlier in life and before the onset of heart disease, help patients better adhere to their CPAP, and to continue to research new ways to treat sleep apnea that are well tolerated and effective. We also recognize that new studies will be needed to study the effects of more effective levels of CPAP and other treatments on important health outcomes, like heart disease, in patients both with and without known heart disease.
We ask you to stay involved in MyApnea.Org and let us know how together we can solve this important questions.
This article was written by Dr. Glaucylara Reis Geovanini, MD, P Lehmann Fellow in Cardiology, and Dr. Susan Redline, MD, MPH, Professor of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, MyApanea.Org Principal Investigator and Steering Committee Co-chair. Read the full New England Journal of Medicine article here.