We use cookies and other tools to enhance your experience on our website and to analyze our web traffic.
For more information about these cookies and the data collected, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

Sierra

Sierra
Joined Jul 2018
Bio

CPAP: AirSense 10 AutoSet

Set to CPAP Fixed Mode

Pressure 11 cm

Ramp: Auto

Ramp Start: 9 cm

EPR: 2, Full Time

Mask: ResMed AirFit P10 Nasal Pillow

Canada

Sierra
Joined Jul 2018
Bio

CPAP: AirSense 10 AutoSet

Set to CPAP Fixed Mode

Pressure 11 cm

Ramp: Auto

Ramp Start: 9 cm

EPR: 2, Full Time

Mask: ResMed AirFit P10 Nasal Pillow

Canada

I have not tried a mask like this one, but have thought that the nasal pillow version of it may be worth a try. I believe BUG has tried this mask or a similar one and had some issues with it. I will leave it to BUG to cover them.

The masks I have tried in order are:

ResMed AirFit P10 Nasal Pillow - It works very well for me, is comfortable, quiet, and when the headgear is working the leaks are reasonable. However the headgear is a pain to keep adjusted and the straps keep slipping.

ResMed AirFit F20 Full Face - It is well made with substantial headgear, but I could not make it seal with any reasonable amount of headgear tension. Probably only used it 2-3 nights and gave up on it. It is in the spare parts box.

ResMed Quattro Full Face - My son uses this one and he gave me a spare mask. I hated it for the same reasons as the F20, but the Quattro was worse. Did not make it through one full night of sleep.

F&P Brevida Nasal Pillow - This has a better headgear than the P10 but the nasal housing is much larger in size and not as comfortable when sleeping on my side. It also irritated my nose between the nostrils. I gave it to my wife who was using a ResMed Mirage FX Nasal Mask. It had to be adjusted very tight to make it seal and she was annoyed by the marks the mask and straps were leaving on her face in the morning. She loves the Brevida and gets almost zero leakage with it.

ResMed Swift FX Nasal Pillow - I basically bought this mask for the much better headgear and a nasal pillow design similarity to the P10. It was fine except for the vents. Unlike the P10 model which has a diffuser vent on each side of the nasal chamber, the Swift has angled straight through holes. The velocity of the air coming out those vents is like standing behind a jet engine. I could not find any position when sleeping where the air velocity would not be constantly waking me up.

Sierra FX-10 Hybrid - This mask I made by fitting the Swift headgear to the P10 Nasal housing. From my post, at this link, it looks like I have been using it for 3 years now. I've replaced the silicone nasal pillow cushion once, and that is it other than periodically replacing the 3M tape that holds the splice together. I love the mask. Works great and is quiet.

For the life of me I don't understand why ResMed does not put the Swift headgear on the P10 mask. That would be a winner.

Actually I have zero concern that my ResMed AirSense 10 AutoSet is not reporting AHI properly. And with AHI averaging under 1.0 I really have no room for improvement. I sleep just fine if I avoid naps during the day and don't try to sleep more than 8 hours at night. If I get to the point where I cannot maintain AHI under 5, with centrals being the dominant type, then I will consider an ASV. I am currently no where near to that point.

If you were diagnosed with a CA index of >53 then you are dealing with a very different situation. A sleep test is done with no treatment pressure, so treatment pressure is obviously not that cause of your central apnea. An ASV would be an obvious choice.

If I was to wish for a technical improvement to my ResMed APAP it would be the ability to distinguish between obstructive hypopnea and central hypopnea. Some in lab polysomnography tests can do this, but I am not aware of any APAPs that can do it. Currently the ResMed APAP responds to OA and hypopnea events with a pressure increase. CA events are correctly not responded to. The ideal auto treatment would be to only respond to OA and obstructive hypopnea with a pressure increase, while providing no pressure increase to CA and central hypopnea. I suspect that this is technically very hard to do, so they are not doing it. The flow pulsing technique they use is probably not suitable for a hypopnea situation and only works in a no flow situation.