The following observations are based on vague memories and general impressions.
I understand that this series of surveys is a sequence of preexisting questionnaires but there is something wrong in how they connect and how they function in conjunction with one another.
In three or four of those surveys I felt that I didn't belong, that the survey was asking the wrong questions or offering the wrong answers.
One simple example is a comprehensive series of questions about snoring which I simply cannot do whilst I am using a CPAP machine, which is all the time. This survey (from memory) is well before any surveys to do with CPAP therapy or compliance.
There needs to be a clear delineation at the start for CPAP users so that surveys like the one about snoring could be bypassed or replaced by equivalent CPAP user queries.
The survey related to removing the mask presumes that it is only with intent or due to forgetfulness or neglect and not due to simply knocking it off during the process of sleeping. The wording or the frequency options needs to be adjusted.
The questions about compliance penalties/rewards were totally irrelevant in my world and I don't want anything to do with the system that invokes it.
Emotional consequences are too subjective and too easily misconstrued. These surveys do not effectively allow for real limitations both in practical life and because of other health issues and although there is a box for 'other' health problems I doubt that they are taken into account when the scores are being generated.
The medical advice surveys toward the end were inadequate and vague in view or their potential applications. They needed to be far more detailed and more purposeful.
I may be an oddball but I am most certainly not the only one and it would only take a few minor adjustments to make these surveys feel more relevant and comprehensive and less intent on policing compliance.