We use cookies and other tools to enhance your experience on our website and to analyze our web traffic.
For more information about these cookies and the data collected, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

ittiandro

ittiandro
Joined Oct 2020
ittiandro
Joined Oct 2020

Hi thanks for your reply and your offer to review some of my Oscar reports. I don’t know how to attach them, though. I have no IMAGE files for them, only PDF documents. If you want, I can e-mail them to you. Or you can give me instructions. In the meantime, I’d like to comment briefly on your reply, with a few questions, so that I can better understand how to read the reports . It is fascinating, but a bit challenging as I am neither a doctor, nor a technician with biomedical background ( I can read much more easily… ancient Greek than matters pertaining to medical technology ..) First off, I have compared both the Oscar and the ResMed reports . Indeed, that inverse correlation holds for both. You were right, there are no AHI’s in the report for the hourly time windows of the large leaks. Why so ? How reliable then are these reports if they miss some AHI’s? . Let me say, though, that I find it difficult to understand why both Oscar and ResMed should exclude from the count the AHI’s occurring when the leaks are large. Why should these AHI’s be of a lesser value in the overall clinical appraisal of the report, to the point of ignoring them? In fact, I find it a bit intriguing that my doctor would want to increase the pressure setting in spite of the very low AHI readings. I simply told him that occasionally I still wake up in a light sweat and a slight head ache. So he must have sniffed something else, in spite of the very low number of AHI’s. … May be I misunderstood the explanation he gave me, which you yourself question, but my doctors’ explanation went at least some way to explain the correlation, rather than simply saying that both Resmed or Oscar have deliberately designed the reports to ignore AHI’s when the leaks are large. If so, the question is, again, why? Perhaps there is a scientific explanation.... Secondly, why do you say that in the 2nd report with large leaks that you zoomed on there must be some AHI’s that are not shown?
Thirdly, I assume that perhaps the duration of the AHI’s is more important than their number, but where is the duration of each AHI occurrence ( or the total duration) shown? Lastly, in my reports which you will hopefully receive, the mask pressure graphic shows as “plots disabled “ Why ?

You may want to have a look at these issues. I’d really appreciate.

Thanks

Franco V.

Just a few thoughts

From my Resmed SD reports I have been able to learn a few interesting things ..Of course the number of AHI/hr events gives a good, overall indication of the sleep quality.

The doctor told me that my AHI score went dramatically down from 30-40 AHI/hr to an average of 2. ( Strangely, though, I never had any symptoms before going on treatment, but I have them now, because I feel more sleepy and sluggish than before..) . All this sounds great..

The point I am making, though, is that I see from the SD reports that the AHI rating is like an umbrella which includes other sleep apnea parameters like OSA, hypoapnea, clear airway and RERA, each one going with its own number of events into the total number of AHI's./hr : for ex. OSA, which is a total airway blockage, is, I believe, more serious than hypoapnea, which is only a restriction of the airway and does allow the flow of air. The RERA. events, too, can be as serious and as damaging ( especially for the brain) as OSA.

All this to say that the sane AHI rating could have a different clinical significance depending on the mix OSA, Hypoapnea, RERA and Clear Airway.
In my report, there were also instances of a Cheyne-Stokes respiration pattern. I know what it is. I mentioned all this to my doctor, but he politely scoffed everything off, like I was a..smart ass. All he said was " Don't worry, you are doing well,., As I said before, I am not too sure I'm doing better than before ..May be he just went by the number of AHI's, without looking at the details of the reports..

Ittiandro .